Where is peasemore




















A Foster Cllr. Homewood Cllr. Prest from 7. Village Pond : Clerk confirmed that enquiries had not found an owner for the village pond, BBOWT guidance on management had suggested that the duck weed should be cleared by hand 3 — 4 times a year, from this wildlife and plants would start to improve. No benefit seen in installing a pump, best to kept as a natural pond. There was an option to put a formula in to reduce the weed but management by hand agreed as the best choice initially.

Following legal advice from BALC, Clerk explained that process of claiming the land by the PC could be lengthy and expensive, suggested that a group of volunteers would be best placed to go ahead with the management suggested.

D Brady to speak to neighbours. SSE : Progress had been made following conversations with Mr Duffield and SSE, Clerk confirmed that SSE were in the process of surveying trimming works required but unfortunately ideal time for works after harvest before planting was starting to pass.

Clerk to keep in touch. Hall Windows : Clerk confirmed that order had been placed, appointment awaited for final measure up. Website : Clerk reported that Peasemore website looked to be offline. I would not assume to know anything else about what you know, but I suspect it is very little of anything. And just to clarify, what exactly are you proposing should be done to investigate Barry King's claims?

That is apart from your juvenile attempts at provoking unproductive conflict. Last time I was at GC it was a business park - full of double glazing firms and courier businesses. This was all dated so seriously dated in UK terms. Never come across this before though so will look into it a lot more. Also looking at the footage from this would appear to be the building of the business park I visited in ' Anyone near the area want to post some up to date pics of GC?

Both of your posts are full of assumptions of me and what I know. You are therefore posting with prejudice. You know nothing of me, what I have done or where I have been so please cease with the wild assumptions eh? You know nothing, dont assume you do. Your sly digs and insults have also been noted. I could have picked enormous holes in your post where you constantly contradict yourself but I wont. As I stated in the other thread, I'm not having a discussion by proxy.

If Barry King doesnt have the guts to come here on his own and debate his allegations, that says everything about him and people canmake their own decisions as to his authenticity. At least John Lear has the courage of his convictions and will defend his ideas. Kings abscence and lack of defence of any of his wild allegations is noted. It is obvious from your post and one point in particular that you are in contact with him and you are either he, or he is attempting to run a debate through you.

It wont work. It would seem that Barry King is happy to hide behind the skirts of others, and is unwilling to enter into any discussion of his allegations which is what would be expected from anyone who had concocted the entire thing. If he is happy being labelled a hoaxer, thats fine, but Im getting a bit fed up with his disciples coming on and squealing about how wonderfull he is, and how true his allegations about the goings-on at Peasemore are, yet are quite happy to let Peasemore continue without actually doing anything about it.

If Peasemore exists which I still seriously doubt , the information about it should be made completely public and the place closed down. If both you and King have evidence of Aliens, and Prgrammable Genetic life forms and Time Travel then that information should be compiled and sent off to every newspaper and TV channel in the world.

But you wont, will you? Because there is nothing under Peasemore other than good English earth. Now Im off to stay with my daughter in OZ for a month or so. I may reply to you while Im down there, if I can, but dont wait up.

Toodle Pip. Originally posted by realyweely AlienwatcherUK. Those posts are in this thread, they should be easy to find and quote, even for you. Why don't you actually quote what you are talking about instead of your vague, misjudged and incorrect comments?

The reason why you won't is because it is easy to give the impression of having an argument but much more difficult to actually engage in one. So that is why you stick with vague allusions to things rather than the facts.

Strange considering you say you are so interested in evidence and fact. Again I say to you, quote me. Actually come up with some 'concrete evidence' or forget it. You do enjoy your florid language don't you? I know a great deal actually. Tut, tut, you were making assumptions there. What insults were those exactly? Quote me. Oh you 'could' could you? But you won't. You are confusing the word couldn't with the word could and the word won't with the word can't.

You really are laughable. I have not contradicted myself at all. Again, if you disagree with me quote me. Your vague allusions only highlight your lack of any real argument. And before you no doubt say you simply can't be bothered to waste your time posting a reasoned argument, consider the fact that any reasonably intelligent adult could have done so in the same amount of time it took you to post the nervous and defensive ramblings which you have posted.

I know of the facilities independently of Barry King. In fact I know more about them than he does. So what you are saying is that you will not discuss underground facilities in Berkshire with anyone other than Barry King?

Why have you already done so then in this and other threads? And of course that does mean that you will no longer be able to discuss underground facilities unless Barry King decides to discuss it with you. Your 'leaps of logic' and lack of reasoning say everything about you and the reasons why you are so narrow minded and so obviously lacking in intelligence. Did it ever occur to you that there are reasons other than 'guts' why Barry King or anyone may choose to ignore you?

If Barry King chooses not to debate with you all it says about him is that he has chosen not to debate with you. Nothing more. You are the one looking for more than there is. I deal with facts. You accuse Barry King of coming forward with information for fame and attention but you are the one with delusions of grandeur, why else would you assume that anyone would draw any conclusions concerning the underground facilities which Barry King has discussed, from the fact that he has chosen not to debate it with you, the 'Great Realy Weely' the 'Unmasker of Charlatans?

And yes you did use those words in your posts about Barry etc. By the way, have you found out how much that village hall costs to rent yet? Don't forget the velvet curtains, Victorian camera and black oversized cape, those things are always useful when unmasking charlatans.

With all those things you are 'noting' isn't it a pity you didn't make any when you wandered around in the dark at Peasemore looking for air vents?

Contemporary, spacious and stylish. Quaint town location. Stunning views from all rooms. Excellent walking, cycling and rowing area. Henley 10 miles. Sign up to receive the very best of OS and its group of companies, straight to you by email. Seven Barrows. Priory Cottages. Childrey, St Marys Church. Didcot Railway Centre. Mell Green.

Brightwalton Holt. Beedon Hill. Leckhampstead Thicket. World's End. North Heath. Brightwalton Green. East Ilsley. West Ilsley. Little Hungerford. Hampstead Norreys. South Fawley. Great Shefford. Wickham Heath.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000